Like us on Facebook!



English English

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to

Microgram - Is Flow Additive?

I posed the above poll on Twitter to see what people thought. The reservoir answer, while the most popular, was actually a distractor item - that option doesn't actually have anything to do with liter flow / speed. The basic question here is: If you add more devices to a patient, does it increase the overall speed of oxygen deliver? Why does this even matter? 

If a patient has an inspirtory flow demand that exceeds the flow of gas we are delivering to them, they will entrain room air in inhalation, causing the fraction of oxygen we are delivering to them to be diluted. Therefore, we want to do our best to meet or exceed their inspiratory flow demands. I know a lot of people are using flush with these devices, but I wanted to use the standard 15 Lpm in this example to drive the point home. 


Check out this illustration:

You have 30 gallons per minute hitting the bottom of the tank. Behind the mystery door, would you be able to tell me how many hoses are feeding that 30 gallons per minute flow? No. I could have 10 hoses running at 3 gallons per minute, or 2 hoses running at 15 gallons per minute. What really matters is the total amount of volume that is hitting the bottom of the tank over a set time limit (in this case one minute). 

One hose is running at 5 gallons per minute, another at 15, another at 10. We can see that none of these hoses are running at 30 gallons per minute, but their combined flow does cause 30 gallons per minute to be delivered to the tank. The hole in the tank (representing our patient taking in air) is irrelevent to the speed coming in - though it does have other clinical implications. Our goal would be to create a reservoir for the patient. What would that look like in our illustration? The tank filling up faster than it is draining - this would be exceeding the inspiratory demands of gas flow. 


Another illustration: 

You may think, but if you're looking at two cars driving down the road at 15 MPH that there speed is not additive. In this instance, you would be correct. However, we have to look at this problem differently to get the answer we are looking for. 

 The amount of cars delivered to the pile is an accurate representation of the amount of volume delivered, not how many MPH it is traveling on the road. 

 In conclusion, yes, the flow we are delivering with two devices is additive. This is important information when we consider strategies to rid the patient of nitrogen, do our best to meet or exceed their inspiratory demand, and reduce anatomical dead space. 

60 Second Read "Paddling the STEMI"
The Agitated (NIPPV) Patient
20 June 2020
FOAMfrat Podcast
 I remember when we first started to entertain the idea of starting a podcast, Eric Bauer @FlightBridgeED had told us the key to a successful podcast was consistency. The internet is flooded with podcasts that start off with a ton of steam and s...
22 May 2020
FOAMfrat Podcast
“Tube’s in.”“Let’s double check that depth.”“I’ve got a good end tidal CO2 waveform.”“Saturations maintaining?”“Tube still looks good in the glottis.”"Let’s secure this thing." “How long ago did we give that ketamine?”….For some, the next words ...
19 May 2020
FOAMfrat Podcast
 When I first started learning ultrasound a few years ago I was taught that vertical lines moving back and forth with ventilation indicated fluid in the lungs. It looked like a car's head light in the fog and was called a "B-Line".  Th...
29 April 2020
FOAMfrat Podcast
In this episode we talk with Michael Perlmutter (@DitchDoc14) who recently released a poster board for an upcoming paper evaluating the safety and efficacy of push-dose nitroglycerin in EMS for patients experiencing sympathetic induced pulmonary edem...
26 April 2020
FOAMfrat Podcast
A few months ago Sam and I started putting together a ventilator module within the FOAMfrat refresher course. Our hopes were to create a "beginners guide" into the world of mechanical ventilation. As we created each lesson, we would discuss further p...

 © 2012-2020 FlightBridgeED, LLC. - All rights reserved.

~ Established 2012. FlightBridgeED, LLC. is headquartered in Scottsville, Kentucky.~
The name FlightBridgeED is a registered trademark of FlightBridgeED, LLC. The FlightBridgeED helicopter logo is a trademark of FlightBridgeED, LLC.
F.A.S.T. is a sales mark of FlightBridgeED, LLC. related to printed books and other related materials, as well as the F.A.S.T. symposium.

Privacy Policy - Refund Policy - Exam Pass Commitment