A few days ago I put up a thought experiment blog on generalizing the dose of rocuronium to 100 mg for anyone over the age of 18 years old. You can find that post here.

 

 

Here are my thoughts: 

 

1. Based off height not weight. 

 

2. Some the dosing range of Roc is very wide 0.9 to 2 mg/kg. 100mg would give 1.2 mg/kg for any male up to 6ft 2inches and 2mg/kg for some a male at 5 ft. Both of these are within acceptable dosing recommendations. Only variable is length of paralysis.

 

3. The argument of commonplace and laziness I can sympathize with- yet I don’t buy it. If anyone has ever watched an anesthesiologist dose medications it is anything but a perfect science. Why? Knowing how the drugs work opens up some freedom. Not recommending free lance dosing-but in some situations we are being pedantic over things that don’t matter.

 

4.Shock dosed higher? Yes I say double it. 

 

5.We will lose our math skills- this is the caveman fire argument that we saw with direct vs video laryngoscopy. Psh

 

 

 

My wicked smart friend Joey Loehner had some fiery angst built up!

I asked him to channel it into a blog for a view from the "this is a stupid idea" vantage point.

 

Rebuttal to The Fixed Dose Paralytics Thought Experiment

 

While I rarely disagree with FOAMed’s power couple- the post this morning hits on something

that I am very passionate about.

 

To clarify

I am not against fixed-dose Paralytics; I am against Fixed-Dose Medicine. We are the

professionals in the world of Prehospital Medicine, and the continual dumbing down of what we

do is the biggest danger to our profession and our patients.

 

*The obvious caveat to weight-based dosing are meds such as ASA, Nitro, etc., that only come

in one preparation*

 

Reasoning

The rationale for always dosing based on weight is many-pronged. First, it is the

most accurate dose for the actual patient in front of you. Second, it keeps your med math skills

strong. Third, it narrows the difference between the Ped/Neo population and the Adult

population. Now let’s break down each point!

 

Most Accurate

Medications should always be dosed based on the way they are designed to

be dosed- which is weight! It is important to note that some medications are dosed based on

Ideal Body Weight (IBW) and some are dosed based on Actual Body Weight (ABW). It is

important to know the difference. Meds dosed based on IBW will have a theoretical Max Dose

(i.e. 99% of the population isn’t over 7’, so having a max dose that may cut off the 7’6”

Basketball player is a pretty minimal risk), whereas meds that are dosed based on ABW will

have no realistic Max Dose. We have all seen “My 600lb Life”. Giving our patients the correct

dose of the medication ensures the safety of the pt and the effectiveness of the medication

given. We are caring for the patient in front of us, not the hypothetical patient that Fixed-Dose

Guidelines assume is running around everywhere. This seems like a no-brainer.

 

Math Skills

Let’s all be honest for a moment- we suck at estimating ABW. We suck even more

at med math. For systems that run off of a Fixed-Dose premise (i.e. 2mg for this, 5mg for this,

100mg for this, etc..), there is little math in day to day patient care. This inevitably leads to the

reduction in skill at performing needed calculations under pressure. Additionally, the chances of

a med error will be significantly increased when different concentrations of a particular

medication are introduced to the system (due to shortage, cost, availability, etc.). This also

leads to another HUGE problem for a lot of clinicians- Rounding! This is a slight tangent, but

something that really grinds my gears. I cannot count how many times I have been proctoring a

scenario and the clinician comes up with a number (say 160mg of Ketamine for the RSI of an

80kg pt), and immediately rounds that up to an easier number to remember (like 200mg). That

is a dosing difference of 20%!! We should give the right dose of the right drug to the right patient

via the right route at the right time- every time. It is a simple concept!

 

Narrowing the Gap

Now, for the culmination of why I believe this is so important! One of the

areas that most clinicians struggle with is Pediatric medication dosing. This is a perceptual

problem that results from the way most clinicians are taught to treat kids. Kids are not small

 

adults, adults are large kids! The dosing for almost every drug that covers both peds and adults

is the exact same--at the weight-based dose. If we lay a stronger foundation when introducing

concepts to student paramedics, then we could help to reduce the med errors, stress, and

confusion that often result during pediatric calls for service.

The Solution- We begin by teaching a single Weight-Based Dose for every applicable

medication in the drug box. This dose will hold true for all ages of patients! This allows for

comfort and repetition with med math and the dosing of medications for all patient populations. I

also strongly believe that it will reduce the frequency of med errors, as med math will become a

much more frequently used skill. Frequency and practice increase the competency of a clinician

with a specified skill.

 

Barriers

I believe that the two biggest barriers to this becoming commonplace are the “The

Safety Net” concept, and the general Laziness/Unwillingness to change of some clinicians. I

don’t believe that the latter really needs to be expounded upon, so I will explain the concept of

the Safety Net. Many Clinical Managers and Medical Director’s worry about med errors, and

having a Safety Net for providers on difficult/task saturating calls is their solution for preventing

errors. I recognize this idea and believe that it is a very valid concern. I believe that the idea

behind most Fixed-Dose drug dosages is to help cognitively offload the provider, and minimize

the odds of that provider freezing-up or making an error on the scene.

 

This is undoubtedly a good thing to have, and helps to protect both the provider and the patient. Common Safety Net

systems such as Handtevy and Broselow are a great fallback to prevent the provider from

making a substantial error. However, these should never be the “go-to” for the clinician.

It is important to have adequate safety nets in place to help prevent medication errors, clinician

stress, and organizational liability. However, these Safety Nets should never become the

primary method of providing patient care. We should always make every effort to give the exact

dose for the exact patient in front of us, not for some hypothetical 100kg person.

 

alright now go check out the podcast! 

 

 

 

Original author: Tyler Christifulli
1
Episode 60: SecondShift and the BIG House
Fixed Dose Paralytics (Thought Experiement)

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://foamfrat.com/

10 September 2020
FOAMfrat Podcast
  My buddy Jay Nance and I went on the Mind Body Medic Podcast with absolutely no agenda. This is a podcast within the FlightBridgeED Podcast Network hosted by my dude and friend to FOAMfrat, Chris Meeks. The conversation had limited banter and ...
18 August 2020
FOAMfrat Podcast
The whole FOAMfrat team loves listening to audio books. Last week, Austin Quillet pitched the idea of turning our blogs into a audio book style format. So we figured, why not give it a shot? We put this audio blog into a story format with some sound ...
08 August 2020
FOAMfrat Podcast
  A few months ago in our weekly team meeting, Mike Brown(@FireMedicFPC) and Jared Patterson(@OneRadMedic) pitched the idea of starting a podcast that takes questions from clinicians all around the world and answers them in five minutes or less....
20 June 2020
FOAMfrat Podcast
  I remember when we first started to entertain the idea of starting a podcast, Eric Bauer @FlightBridgeED had told us the key to a successful podcast was consistency. The internet is flooded with podcasts that start off with a ton of steam and ...
22 May 2020
FOAMfrat Podcast
“Tube’s in.” “Let’s double check that depth.” “I’ve got a good end tidal CO2 waveform.” “Saturations maintaining?” “Tube still looks good in the glottis.” "Let’s secure this thing."  “How long ago did we give that ketamine?” …. For some, the nex...
Don't have an account yet? Register Now!

Sign in to your account