The Science Of Compressions

FullSizeRender 2

One thing we can be sure of throughout the changes of advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), is that chest compressions have remained relatively consistent in recommendation and level of evidence from the American Heart Association (AHA). Besides some clarification in 2015 on the maximum frequency of chest compressions per minute 1, the science behind high quality and continuous chest compressions has remained salient. Aware that chest compressions are one of the key links in the cardiac chain of survival, we seem to see trends of pawning this skill off to the person on scene with the most minimal amount of clinical training. This is usually to allow the more experienced providers to perform skills such as IV/IO access, intubation, and pushing medications. The BLS skill of performing chest compressions and rapid defibrillation, is without doubt the highest priority intervention. So why do we see chest compressions pushed down the line of delegation?

I believe that as health care providers we have a desire to perform skills that challenge us. Simply performing chest compressions, doesn’t appear to be a challenging task. Let’s see if by breaking down the science of chest compressions, we can change our outlook.

When teaching chest compressions, I commonly ask one of the students “what is a normal blood pressure?” They usually respond with “120/80”. I then ask them to match each of those number to a cycle in the process of performing chest compressions (systole vs diastole). They immediately put systole and compression together, which leaves diastole and recoil remaining. This is a key point when teaching the importance of coronary perfusion pressure.  So what exactly is coronary perfusion pressure, and why is it pertinent to this discussion? Just like every other tissue in the body, the heart requires its own blood supply. It receives this blood supply through the coronary arteries mostly during diastole. Let’s trace the flow of blood through the heart, and watch the path it takes to enter into the coronary arteries.

As blood returns to the heart from the inferior and superior vena cava, it enters into the right atrium. The right atrium serves as a conduit, and dumps the blood through the tricuspid valve, and into the right ventricle. Before the ventricle contracts, the atria contract and “top off” the right ventricle. This sequence is known as the “atrial kick”. The blood is then pushed from the right ventricle (RV) into the pulmonary arteries to offload carbon dioxide and onboard oxygen. The freshly oxygenated blood will then make it’s way via the pulmonary veins, through the left atrium, through the mitral valve, and into the left ventricle (LV). This process mimics the same as the right side and will duplicate the much needed atrial kick to augment cardiac output. Here is where coronary perfusion comes into play. As the blood is ejected from the left ventricle, and through the semilunar aortic valve, it will have to overcome the afterload of the systemic vascular resistance. In other words, to keep forward flow with a diastolic pressure of 80, we would have to generate a LV pressure large enough to overcome the 80mmhg of pressure exerted on the outside walls of the aortic valve. Once the pressure within the LV is high enough to open the aortic valve, the oxygenated blood from the LV will be pumped to the systemic vasculature. Soon after the initial ejection, the pressure will be once again higher on the systemic side of the aortic valve, and will cause it to close. The closure of the aortic valve is a very important moment in the cardiac sequence. Why? Because when the aortic valve is open, it covers small holes in the aortic wall called the coronary ostia. These are the entrance into the coronary arteries. Once the aortic valve is closed, these ostia are now open to receive blood from the aorta. Now when we refer to the coronary perfusion pressure, we are not just looking at the pressure available in the aorta during diastole. That would be too easy! There is a pressure that the blood within the heart exerts on the walls of the coronary arteries. Think of it like wearing a pair of jeans, the larger the person in the jeans, the harder it is for them to put their hands in their pockets! In this illustration the pockets are the coronary arteries, and the large person wearing the jeans is the pressure inside the chambers of the heart. We usually refer to this pressure as the end diastolic pressure, and it changes from RV to LV. What kind of things increase the pressure that the coronary arteries must overcome to maintain forward flow? Anything that increases pressure inside the hearts chambers (fluid overload), or procedures that increase intrathoracic pressure such as positive pressure ventilation (PPV). This is why AHA recommends we don’t excessively ventilate patients, especially during cardiac arrest! 1

Research shows that there is a direct correlation between coronary perfusion pressure and obtaining ROSC. A study by Paradis et al 3, showed that at a CPP less than 15mmHg had a zero chance of obtaining ROSC. So this is number is pretty important! 


So now that we have traced the flow of blood through a healthy individual’s heart, let’s look at some of the changes that occur once the heart stops. To best understand these changes, I’m going to reference a physician & physiologist by the name Arthur Guyton. Guyton did some very interesting studies on mean systemic filling pressure and venous return 2, but one of the points I found fascinating by his canine experiment, is the change in pressure gradients that occur once the heart stops. As this graph illustrates, 4 when cardiac output drops, venous pressure increases. This will happen until the vessels come to a certain moment of equipoise. This systemic balance of the vasculature is known as the mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP). The loss of gradient and aortic pressure, immediately drops the diastolic pressure, and thus the coronary perfusion pressure.  How do we restore that gradient?


When we begin chest compressions we are essentially shuttling blood from the venous side to the arterial side of the system. As we eject blood into the aorta, we will eventually build up a pressure head from the peripheral resistance of systemic vascular beds. This will begin to rebuild the gradient of the arteries having a higher pressure than the veins. The restoration of the gradient needs to build up enough pressure to create something I call the “Aortic Reserve”. This is pressure the coronary arteries will be able to pull from during the recoil phase of chest compressions. If this reserve is not maintained through continuous chest compressions, the coronary arteries will not have adequate perfusion. The act of recoil acts as a bellow to pull flow from the aortic reserve, and into the coronary circulation. Knowing this, the importance of allowing full recoil further emphasizes its importance.


Remember, the leaflets of the aortic valve cover the entrance to the coronary arteries when they are open. This is important because if we deliver chest compressions with too high of a frequency, we will essentially be spending more time with the aortic valve open, and thus the entrance to the coronary arteries blocked. This is why in 2015 AHA recommended chest compressions remain between 100 and 120 beats per minute 1. This also explains one of the reasons why we can see signs of rate induced ischemia in tachycardic patients.

The intervention of chest compressions is to hopefully build a very sturdy bridge to defibrillation. In order to provide enough coronary perfusion to successfully shock someone out of pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, it is vital we completely understand that when we stop doing chest compressions the vascular gradient begins to equalize. Restoration of gradient seems to be the key to improving coronary perfusion pressure.

I am a very visual person, and the science behind compressions helped me to realize all the mistakes one can make without knowing exactly what they are doing. With each push and release, we have the ability to drastically change the clinical course of our patient. Resuscitation needs to be performed with enough precision to know what to do, and enough knowledge to recognize why you are doing it.


1.2015 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. PMID: 23342689 PMCID: PMC3783995

2.Guyton AC, Abernathy B, Langston JB, Kaufmann BN, Fairchild HM. Relative importance of venous and arterial resistances in controlling venous return and cardiac output. Am J Physiol 196: 1008–1014, 1959

3. JAMA. 1990 Feb 23; 263(8):1106-13

4. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.44.6.739 Circulation Research. 1979; 44:739-747

Figure’s 2-1 & 2-2, illustrated by Joel Porter, Lifestar Paramedic.


Tyler Christifulli (@christifulli88) is a Critical Care Paramedic and Training Supervisor for Lifestar EMS, located throughout southern Wisconsin. He is the creator and producer of the Lifestar Training & Education Center podcast. Coming up on 10 years in EMS, Tyler is focused on innovating the ways in which we teach emergency medicine. 


The Motherly Instinct of Trouble Shooting


The other day I was laid up sick in bed and listening to the soundtrack of my house. It included little feet running, cartoons playing, and of course babies crying. Besides realizing my wife was Wonder Woman, I noticed that she could almost immediately tell what the baby needed by its cry. I thought to myself, "My wife has become a master of little human trouble shooting!"

A few days later I was on a critical care assignment with multiple drips, ventilator, and arterial line. I realized that in some odd way I had been tending to the alarms of the equipment in the same fashion as a mom tends to her children. I knew the tones of each piece of equipment, and exactly how to rectify the issue.  However, as soon as I nursed one alarm to sleep, another would start.

Two years ago at Lifestar, I was noticing  that our scene times for critical care assignments could at times go longer than seemingly necessary. While some of these were complicated and warranted, others were your garden variety transport. These scenarios compelled me to analyze our processes - specifically how our tams went about switching equipment over. I set up two IV pumps with two infusions, and randomly asked providers to swing by while on shift, and swap the drips over from one pump to another. I recorded them performing this task... over ... and over again! I reviewed the videos and studied  each move that they made. I noticed that they were able to perform the task super quick! However, when they went to hit "start" and initiate the infusion, they ran into alarms such as "fluid side occluded" or "check air sensor". The average time to swap just two infusions was almost 15 minutes! Not because of the initial task of swapping the drips, but the process of trouble shooting.




So what did we do?

Our Critical Care Coordinator and I set up an entire training simulation centered on trouble shooting equipment. The group would sit in a half circle around our mock hospital room and watch our teams run the simulation. Recognizing that most of the trouble shooting occurred during the initial transition from hospital equipment to transport equipment, we felt that this was a great place to start. We did things like loosening connections on the vent circuit, removing the diaphragm from the ventilator, and displacing the driving piston on the IV pump. Initially the team would get frustrated, they would start to fumble and make simple mistakes. Some of the actions they would perform to fix a situation would actually cause further problems down the road. This was great! We had successfully created a simulation that brought to fruition the realistic complications that can occur on an assignment.


As you can see in the picture above, the observers will make silent notes from their “foot of the bed” view. This proves to be an excellent training exercise not just for the people running the simulation, but those watching from the outskirts as well.

As we would debrief the scenario, discussions would echo “What if we did it this way” or “I have an idea to avoid that problem in the future.” Not only did this simulation model teach an organized approach to troubleshooting, it also inspired the providers to go back to their station and really get to know the nuts and bolts of their equipment.

 My philosophy is “If you can reproduce the problem, you can fix it in the future.” I encourage all clinicians to take whatever equipment they use, print out a manual on all the different errors that can occur for that specific model, and attempt to reproduce as many as possible. There is nothing more aggravating than alarms, beeps, and tones from angry equipment echoing throughout your transfer. This stressor can cause good providers to get tunnel vision and forget to monitor patient needs. A solid foundation of trouble shooting can help reduce this stress, maintain quality patient care, and nurse your alarms back to sleep.


nurse alarm back to sleep




Tyler Christifulli (@christifulli88) is a Critical Care Paramedic and

Training Supervisor for Lifestar EMS, located throughout southern Wisconsin.

He is the creator and producer of the Lifestar Training & Education Center podcast.

Coming up on 10 years in EMS, Tyler is focused on innovating the ways in which we teach emergency medicine.

Tyler will be a regular contributor on the FlightBridgeED Blog Team.


Please publish modules in offcanvas position.

Don't have an account yet? Register Now!

Sign in to your account